Tuesday, June 26, 2007
On the move....
We are gearing up for a move to Alexandria, Virginia next week, where EC and I are starting new jobs this summer. I'll begin as a Legislative Correspondent in the U.S. Congress (yep, somehow got a promotion before I started) on July 9th, and EC will start as an Analyst for the Government Accountability Office's Natural Resources & Environment division on August 21st.
Hada Mae is of course oblivious to all the moving boxes in our apartment. Quote from Hadassah: "As long as there is ample supply of milk and naps in D.C., I am strongly in favor of the move. And remember to vote Brownback and/or Huckabee in '08." (oops, she's been listening too much to her dad lately).
Therefore posting will continue to be light, probably for the next couple of weeks at least -- though I am entertaining the idea of a travel blog as I drive from Denver to D.C., stopping in Lawrence, KS, Indianapolis, IN, and Morgantown, WV before landing in Alexandria. We'll see how the trip goes.
Wednesday, June 20, 2007
Protestant Vs. Catholic Heaven
Ok...one more...I can't resist.
After this, I promise, no more deviations from the economic development stuff.
BC
Brief Interlude: "Evangelical Catholics"
Before proceeding with the economic development series below, these two links are worth checking out, one from GetReligion, and the other from the K Street Catholic in D.C.:
"What is an evangelical Roman Catholic?"
and
"Evangelical Catholicism," from Rev. Jay Scott Newman
BC
"What is an evangelical Roman Catholic?"
and
"Evangelical Catholicism," from Rev. Jay Scott Newman
BC
Northern Plains Economic Development, Pt. 1
What better way to spend a late night with a restless 5 lb. baby than to write a few blog posts? Diaper changed? Check. Stomach full? Check. Burped? Check. Clean onesie? Check. Smack dab next to dad's chest? Check. Yet there is some life crisis happening, so *we* are both wide awake. Onward!
Much talk surrounds the future of the Northern Great Plains. Depending on who you are paying attention to, you may believe in either the inevitable decline and abandonment of the region, a slow bleed of America's northern interior -- or you may see an unprecedented economic, demographic and cultural renaissance on the horizon.
Given the recent biofuels boom and economic surge of cities like Fargo and Sioux Falls, most observers currently lean toward the latter. But the region is in a moment of both crisis and opportunity. Consequently, communities across the Northern Plains are vigorously planning for the distant future--something perhaps unthinkable only 15-20 years ago.
Most communities' economic development strategies today derive from two schools of thought:
1) The first is the "Creative Class" theory espoused by economist Richard Florida. Florida suggests successful cities possess "the three T's": Talent, Tolerance and Technology. "Talent" refers to young, single,"creative" professionals who thrive in the 21st century economy (everyone from graphic designers to writers, architects to university professors, software designers to folk musicians). These workers are attracted to places with a high level of outdoor amenities, third-places, music scenes and certain "Tolerant" attitudes: that is, broad acceptance and celebration of "diverse" individuals, especially those who choose alternative sexual lifestyles, whom Florida views as among the most "creative" and therefore most economically desirable. The basic thrust of Florida's idea is that cultural and recreational amenities come first -- and then a dynamic economy, as uber hip, "creative class" workers pour into your city limits.
2) A second school of economic development thought comes from Joel Kotkin, an urban policy and demographics authority with the New America Foundation. Kotkin's approach is essentially the opposite of Florida's: if you don't have quality schools, updated physical and high-tech infrastructure, low crime rates, decent home prices and economic mobility -- don't even think about spending thousands of public dollars on some annual local film festival designed to improve your city's "hipness."
That is, cultural riches follow economic success, and not the other way around. This cultural maturity will lead to even greater economic vitality, but it is not the primary driver of a city's success.
Over the next few days, I'll take a look at the following three approaches to economic development strategy on the Northern Great Plains, including: Aberdeen, South Dakota's "Creative Class" strategic plan, Kotkin's region-wide assessment of the Great Plains, and finally, a scenario planning approach proposed by Northern Great Plains, Inc, of Fargo, North Dakota:
1. "Creative Class" Strategic Plan for Aberdeen (by Florida)
2. Heartland Development Strategy (by Kotkin)
3. Meadowlark Project (Scenario Planning Approach for Policy Development)
BC
Saturday, June 16, 2007
"Public Policy: Where law, business and politics meet."
DU's Institute for Public Policy Studies gets a nod today on ColoradoPols, the insider-driven blog of note in the Rocky Mountain state.
I am not yet nostalgic for the rigors and hoop-jumping of graduate school -- but hey, graduation was only a week ago, so let's give it some time. PhD, anyone? I think I just heard someone who lives in our apartment mention the word "PhD", and it wasn't me....or our 3-week old daughter.
BC
I am not yet nostalgic for the rigors and hoop-jumping of graduate school -- but hey, graduation was only a week ago, so let's give it some time. PhD, anyone? I think I just heard someone who lives in our apartment mention the word "PhD", and it wasn't me....or our 3-week old daughter.
BC
Thursday, June 14, 2007
Oh Gorilla, Grant Us "Energy Independence"
As many South Dakota-based readers know, a deep-pocketed but anonymous entity has been trying to purchase large tracts of land near Elk Point in southeast SoDak for months. Clearly big development plans were afoot.
Code-named "Gorilla," the secret project had everyone from local landowners to the Wall Street Journal buzzing about what the new development might be.
Yesterday, the announcement came: Dallas-based Hyperion Resources is planning to build an "eco-friendly oil refinery," as reported here in the Argus Leader and here in the WSJ. Apparently the Elk Point site is preferred by Hyperion, but not necessarily the final choice.
From the Argus story:
"The project would refine 400,000 barrels of oil into low-sulfur gasoline and diesel fuel each day, enough to serve South Dakota, Iowa and Nebraska, said Richard Benda, state tourism and development secretary. During four years of construction, the project would create an average of 4,500 jobs, Phillips said. Once built, it would employ 1,800 full-time workers earning between $20 and $30 per hour, he said."
As the article goes on to note, this massive "energy center" could coincide with another oil-related project in the state: TransCanada, a Calgary-based energy infrastructure behemoth, has plans to place an underground oil pipeline (the Keystone Pipeline) through eastern South Dakota. From the Argus:
"A Canadian firm, TransCanada, is planning a pipeline that would move 435,000 barrels of crude oil per day under South Dakota by 2009. Trans-Canada spokesman Jeff Rauh said Wednesday that the pipeline is not related to Hyperion, and the two companies have not met.He did say TransCanada always is looking for new customers and could expand its daily volume to 590,000 barrels. Rauh said a spur line of 30 miles or so to meet Hyperion's refinery would be possible."
The pipeline and its proposed route actually would pass over some Carson farmland west of Langford, SD. Needless to say, we will be paying attention in the coming months and years.
BC
Code-named "Gorilla," the secret project had everyone from local landowners to the Wall Street Journal buzzing about what the new development might be.
Yesterday, the announcement came: Dallas-based Hyperion Resources is planning to build an "eco-friendly oil refinery," as reported here in the Argus Leader and here in the WSJ. Apparently the Elk Point site is preferred by Hyperion, but not necessarily the final choice.
From the Argus story:
"The project would refine 400,000 barrels of oil into low-sulfur gasoline and diesel fuel each day, enough to serve South Dakota, Iowa and Nebraska, said Richard Benda, state tourism and development secretary. During four years of construction, the project would create an average of 4,500 jobs, Phillips said. Once built, it would employ 1,800 full-time workers earning between $20 and $30 per hour, he said."
As the article goes on to note, this massive "energy center" could coincide with another oil-related project in the state: TransCanada, a Calgary-based energy infrastructure behemoth, has plans to place an underground oil pipeline (the Keystone Pipeline) through eastern South Dakota. From the Argus:
"A Canadian firm, TransCanada, is planning a pipeline that would move 435,000 barrels of crude oil per day under South Dakota by 2009. Trans-Canada spokesman Jeff Rauh said Wednesday that the pipeline is not related to Hyperion, and the two companies have not met.He did say TransCanada always is looking for new customers and could expand its daily volume to 590,000 barrels. Rauh said a spur line of 30 miles or so to meet Hyperion's refinery would be possible."
The pipeline and its proposed route actually would pass over some Carson farmland west of Langford, SD. Needless to say, we will be paying attention in the coming months and years.
BC
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
Farm Bill, 2007 Iteration
Any readers interested in tracking the progress of the 2007 U.S. Farm Bill, currently winding its way through Congress, should check out Farm Policy, a balanced, fairly comprehensive blog covering the bill's particulars.
The link can also be found in the right column under "Ag and Natural Resource Policy."
BC
Friday, June 8, 2007
Real "Energy Independence"?
Politicians (typically congressmen and women) routinely cite "Energy Independence" as a laudable national goal. What exactly this glossy slogan means is another issue altogether. Most policymakers would argue that deriving all sources of energy consumption from domestic production is virtually impossible in today's globalized economic system. Renewable energy is highly touted, but for the foreseeable future, ethanol, biodeisel, wind turbines, solar panels and the like will cover a growing, but minimal level of our national energy needs.
Enter Western North America: specifically, Colorado, Utah and northern Alberta. Colorado and Utah have as much oil as Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Venezuela, Nigeria, Kuwait, Libya, Angola, Algeria, Indonesia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates combined. Northern Alberta, similarly, holds more oil than all of the Arabian peninsula. The challenging part is mining and extracting the oil, as it not the slippery liquid kind, but the gooey, pasty or rocky variety. But the technology is evolving rapidly. Some estimates say the oil deposit in Colorado and Utah alone could supply U.S. energy needs for another century. Combined with the energy resources of our friendly neighbor to the north, a $20 per-barrel oil market could be just as likely in the coming decades as doomsday "peak oil" predictions. The geopolitical ramifications are, of course, enormous if Chevron, Shell and others pull off an inexpensive and efficient method of mining, extracting and refining the new black gold.
Remember the Middle East, and how we used to spend a great deal of time securing pipelines, production facilities and oil refineries there? Back in the good old days of the early 21st century?
BC
Hmmm...
Scroll a little further down in that linked article for the cons: "the techniques will drain water supplies, scar the landscape and require so much power the skies will be choked with smoke from coal-fed generators."
Yikes. I'm with the Western Colorado Congress on this one -- let's invest that money in research for renewable energy instead. I'm also with former Governor Lamm:"It doesn't excite me because I think they're about to indelibly change our state."
Nope. Not good. Not good at all.
EC
Enter Western North America: specifically, Colorado, Utah and northern Alberta. Colorado and Utah have as much oil as Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Venezuela, Nigeria, Kuwait, Libya, Angola, Algeria, Indonesia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates combined. Northern Alberta, similarly, holds more oil than all of the Arabian peninsula. The challenging part is mining and extracting the oil, as it not the slippery liquid kind, but the gooey, pasty or rocky variety. But the technology is evolving rapidly. Some estimates say the oil deposit in Colorado and Utah alone could supply U.S. energy needs for another century. Combined with the energy resources of our friendly neighbor to the north, a $20 per-barrel oil market could be just as likely in the coming decades as doomsday "peak oil" predictions. The geopolitical ramifications are, of course, enormous if Chevron, Shell and others pull off an inexpensive and efficient method of mining, extracting and refining the new black gold.
Remember the Middle East, and how we used to spend a great deal of time securing pipelines, production facilities and oil refineries there? Back in the good old days of the early 21st century?
BC
Hmmm...
Scroll a little further down in that linked article for the cons: "the techniques will drain water supplies, scar the landscape and require so much power the skies will be choked with smoke from coal-fed generators."
Yikes. I'm with the Western Colorado Congress on this one -- let's invest that money in research for renewable energy instead. I'm also with former Governor Lamm:"It doesn't excite me because I think they're about to indelibly change our state."
Nope. Not good. Not good at all.
EC
Wednesday, June 6, 2007
Huckabee on Evolution, and Creation
I'm not sure if anyone caught the third GOP presidential debate last night -- EC and I just watched it tonight on CNN.com. We're finding it very difficult not to like Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee quite a lot. Part of me thinks: this guy is too reasonable, too grounded, and too witty...to be President of the United States. Check this video on Huckabee's eloquent response to a question about evolution and the Biblical Creation account.
BC
Tuesday, June 5, 2007
New Monastics and the St. Benedict Option
Here's a fascinating interview (from Speaking of Faith) with Shane Claiborne, founder of the New Monasticism: Christians from a variety of backgrounds who chose to live in intentional communities, relocating to what they call "the abandoned places of Empire." Claiborne's community settled in poverty-stricken, hollowed-out North Philadelphia.
EC and I have a couple of friends moving from Colorado Springs to Minneapolis, in order to start just such an intentional community. We ourselves have been (and continue to be) tempted by this lifestyle. At the very least, the New Monastics' emphasis on simplicity and service we hope to incorporate into our own daily lives--even in extraordinarily non-simple Washington, D.C. What a challenge...
BC
p.s. New Monasticism seems in some ways to be the opposite of what Rod Dreher of the Crunchy Con calls "The St. Benedict Option"--that is, calling on Christians to intentionally leave cities and organize themselves into new rural communities.
EC and I have a couple of friends moving from Colorado Springs to Minneapolis, in order to start just such an intentional community. We ourselves have been (and continue to be) tempted by this lifestyle. At the very least, the New Monastics' emphasis on simplicity and service we hope to incorporate into our own daily lives--even in extraordinarily non-simple Washington, D.C. What a challenge...
BC
p.s. New Monasticism seems in some ways to be the opposite of what Rod Dreher of the Crunchy Con calls "The St. Benedict Option"--that is, calling on Christians to intentionally leave cities and organize themselves into new rural communities.
Monday, June 4, 2007
All things new
As is clearly evident, The Wild Olive is undergoing some tansitions. Among them are:
1) Brand new template, which I think looks a bit sharper than the dreary pastels of before, and
2) A different grouping of links on the right column, most notably into areas of policy interest/expertise for EC and myself.
3) A YouTube video feed at the bottom of the page, with random videos sorted by keywords "religion," "politics," "Islam," "Christianity," "campaign," etc....(we may regret this one, as we have little control over what pops up there).
Change is good. Why not spice it up a little?
BC
1) Brand new template, which I think looks a bit sharper than the dreary pastels of before, and
2) A different grouping of links on the right column, most notably into areas of policy interest/expertise for EC and myself.
3) A YouTube video feed at the bottom of the page, with random videos sorted by keywords "religion," "politics," "Islam," "Christianity," "campaign," etc....(we may regret this one, as we have little control over what pops up there).
Change is good. Why not spice it up a little?
BC
Sunday, June 3, 2007
Oops.
Correction: In this recent blog entry, I attempted to paraphrase a quote from Russell Kirk. Not only did I paraphrase the quote (which can be forgiven), I identified the wrong source of the quote (which can't).
The real source of the quote is Daniel Patrick Moynihan, and the real quote is this:
"The central conservative truth is that it is culture, not politics, that determines the success of a society. The central liberal truth is that politics can change a culture and save it from itself." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
You can do with it what you like. Ironically, it could be argued that this quote could be reversed today, with liberals more concerned about the more subtle aspects of culture and conservatives running headlong into political squabbles.
-BC
The real source of the quote is Daniel Patrick Moynihan, and the real quote is this:
"The central conservative truth is that it is culture, not politics, that determines the success of a society. The central liberal truth is that politics can change a culture and save it from itself." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
You can do with it what you like. Ironically, it could be argued that this quote could be reversed today, with liberals more concerned about the more subtle aspects of culture and conservatives running headlong into political squabbles.
-BC
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)